Original PVC conveyor belt (left foreground) compared with newly applied flexible conductive coating (right), restoring surface resistivity from >10⁹ Ω/sq to 10⁶–10⁷ Ω/sq without belt removal.

Cracking of conformal coating is most often discovered not during initial inspection, but after thermal cycling, environmental testing, or extended service exposure.

In field investigations, cracking is rarely caused by a single factor. Instead, it is usually the result of combined stresses, such as excessive coating thickness, rigid material selection, and differential thermal expansion between the coating and substrate.

We commonly see cracking:

• Over sharp component edges or solder fillets
• Where coating thickness exceeds recommended limits
• On assemblies exposed to wide thermal excursions

Importantly, coatings that appear compliant and defect-free at room temperature may still fail under thermal stress if thickness and material flexibility are not properly controlled.

Cracking of conformal coating after thermal cycling, typically occurring at stress points such as solder joints, sharp edges and areas of excessive coating thickness.

In practice, cracking risk is also closely tied to how the coating is applied and cured. Poor control of film build, flash-off and cure conditions can increase internal stress and make later failure more likely. For broader process guidance, see Conformal Coating Curing & Drying.

A deeper technical breakdown of cracking mechanisms and prevention is available in our Defects Hub article on cracking in conformal coating.

A common inspection finding is localised de-wetting of conformal coating, particularly on solder joints or around component leads, even when a cleaning process has been applied beforehand.

This behaviour, commonly referred to as conformal coating de-wetting, is not caused by poor application technique. Instead, it is typically driven by surface energy inconsistencies at the substrate level.

When “Clean” Isn’t Actually Clean

In many cases, the boards are genuinely clean in a visual sense. However, de-wetting is often caused by residues that are invisible to the naked eye — including low-level ionic contamination, surfactant residues from aqueous cleaning, or incompatible cleaning chemistries that leave behind thin boundary films.

Typical Signs of De-Wetting

• Circular pull-back around solder joints
• Patchy coating coverage on ENIG or HASL finishes
• Repeatable locations across multiple assemblies

Why Process Control Matters More Than Application

From a process perspective, this is not something that can be corrected through spray parameters alone. Surface preparation, cleaning chemistry selection and rinse quality are far more influential than coating application settings.

Not a Cosmetic Issue

Crucially, de-wetting should never be treated as cosmetic. It is a clear indicator of a surface energy problem and should always trigger escalation and investigation rather than acceptance.

Most de-wetting issues originate upstream of coating — in cleaning, handling or material compatibility — not within the coating process itself.

For detailed causes, acceptance criteria and corrective actions, see our Defects Hub guidance on de-wetting in conformal coating.

Understand how process control influences coating performance and defect formation.

During inspection of coated assemblies, we occasionally observe conformal coating creeping along exposed wire strands well beyond the intended coated area. This is often flagged as “over-application”, but in practice the root cause is usually more subtle.

This behaviour, commonly referred to as conformal coating wicking, is driven by capillary action rather than excessive application.

In this scenario, the coating is not flowing excessively during application. Instead, capillary forces draw low-viscosity material along fine wire strands, braid structures, or conductor interfaces after deposition. This effect is amplified where flux residues, incomplete cleaning, or high surface energy materials are present.

We most often see this behaviour:

• At wire terminations and soldered pigtails
• Where insulation stripping exposes fine conductor bundles
• When low-viscosity acrylics or urethanes are used without sufficient flash-off

From a process perspective, this is not something that can be “sprayed out”. Masking strategy, cleanliness, and controlled flash times are far more influential than spray parameters alone.

For definitive technical guidance on this phenomenon, see our Defects Hub page on capillary wicking in conformal coating.

ProShieldESD is a filler-free conductive polymer ESD coating designed to create repeatable static-control behaviour across a wide range of materials.

Live testing at Productronica 2025 provided practical evidence of how the coating performs on real substrates including tile, PP flute board, carton, EVA foam, PVC matting, plastic cases, storage bins, brushes and pens.

This page summarises the measured results and shows where ProShieldESD can support controlled ESD-safe environments beyond conventional benches and mats.

Why this testing matters

Many ESD control systems rely on specialist materials, filled plastics, carbon-loaded coatings or temporary surface treatments. These approaches can work, but they often behave differently depending on substrate, wear, environment and application method.

ProShieldESD is designed as a single coating platform that can convert ordinary materials into controlled static-dissipative surfaces.

This makes it useful where manufacturers need to upgrade packaging, flooring, handling aids, storage, fixtures, tools or plastic components without redesigning the whole environment.

Live testing method

The Productronica demonstration used the sparktrap® EPA SafeAssure® from Keinath Electronic GmbH, Germany.

The instrument was used to evaluate coated and reference materials under controlled exhibition conditions using standards-oriented ESD measurement methods.

Measurement capability

• Flat weight probe for surface resistance
• Concentric ring probe for surface resistivity
• Precision 2-point probe for small objects
• Integrated temperature, humidity and voltage monitoring
• High-stability 100 V measurement mode
• IEC 61340 and ANSI/ESD S20.20 oriented evaluation

Environmental conditions

• Temperature: 22–23 °C
• Relative humidity: 53–55% RH
• Test voltage: 100 V

Measured ProShieldESD results

The results show controlled dissipative behaviour across a broad range of coated materials.

Most materials measured within the practical static-dissipative range used for ESD-safe environments, packaging, handling systems and workplace accessories.

Material	Average resistance	Scientific notation	Assessment	Technical note
Flooring tile with ProShieldESD	1.501 MΩ	1.5 × 10⁶ Ω	Excellent	Strong ESD floor range for controlled discharge.
PP flute board	4.778 MΩ	4.8 × 10⁶ Ω	Very good	Stable dissipative range suitable for packaging and handling.
Coated carton box	741.9 MΩ	7.4 × 10⁸ Ω	Very good	Higher dissipative value suitable for packaging applications.
EVA foam	65.35 MΩ	6.5 × 10⁷ Ω	Very good	Consistent dissipative behaviour for protective inserts.
PVC mat	964.3 kΩ	9.6 × 10⁵ Ω	Excellent	Classic ESD mat range around 10⁶ Ω.
ESD linbin	1.699 MΩ	1.7 × 10⁶ Ω	Very good	Suitable range for ESD-safe component storage.
Plastic carry case	1.644 MΩ	1.6 × 10⁶ Ω	Excellent	Uniform dissipation for handling aids.
ESD brush handle	3.009 MΩ	3.0 × 10⁶ Ω	Excellent	Provides a safe discharge path during tool use.
ESD brush bristles	317.0 kΩ	3.1 × 10⁵ Ω	Excellent	Lower resistance supports contact discharge behaviour.
ESD pen	2.113 MΩ	2.1 × 10⁶ Ω	Excellent	Helps prevent charge accumulation during handling.
Metal reference surface	88.19 kΩ	8.8 × 10⁴ Ω	Conductive	Expected conductive reference surface.

What the results show

The testing confirmed that ProShieldESD can generate useful static-control behaviour across very different material types.

This is important because ESD risk is rarely limited to one bench, mat or floor. Charge generation and discharge paths can involve packaging, tools, storage, handling aids, plastics, foam, boards and workplace accessories.

Practical implications

• Floors and mats can be upgraded into controlled dissipative surfaces.
• Plastic handling items can be converted for ESD-safe use.
• Packaging and cartons can be made more suitable for ESD-controlled handling.
• Foams, inserts and flute board can support controlled storage and transport.
• Brushes, pens and small tools can be treated as part of the wider ESD system.

For plastic-specific applications, see anti-static coating for plastic components.

Why filler-free ESD coating is different

Traditional ESD paints and coatings often rely on carbon, graphite, metal particles or conductive fillers. These can affect appearance, surface finish, handling, flexibility, consistency and long-term behaviour.

Filler-free ESD coating uses a different approach by forming a conductive polymer network rather than depending on dispersed particulate fillers.

This can be especially useful where the substrate needs to retain its practical function while gaining controlled static-dissipative behaviour.

Where ProShieldESD fits

ProShieldESD is suitable where manufacturers need to create or improve static-control behaviour across multiple surfaces within a working environment.

It is particularly relevant when standard ESD products are not available, are too expensive, do not fit the geometry, or cannot be adapted easily to the application.

Typical application areas

• ESD flooring and local floor zones
• Plastic components, cases and housings
• Handling aids, trays and fixtures
• Cartons, packaging and flute board
• Foam inserts and protective storage
• Tools, pens, brushes and accessories
• Industrial areas requiring controlled static behaviour

For industrial flooring and higher-risk static-control environments, see ProShieldESD for explosive, ATEX and ESD flooring applications.

Testing does not replace application validation

The Productronica results provide strong evidence that ProShieldESD can produce controlled ESD behaviour across many substrates.

However, each real application still needs practical validation because ESD performance can be influenced by substrate condition, surface preparation, coating thickness, cure, wear, cleaning chemicals, humidity and measurement method.

For production applications, SCH can support substrate trials, resistance testing, coating process development and practical validation through ProShieldESD coating services.

Related ProShieldESD and static-control resources

Use these pages to explore the coating platform, application routes and static-control principles in more detail.

• ProShieldESD coating platform
• Anti-static coating for plastic components
• Explosive, ATEX and ESD flooring applications
• Filler-free ESD coating technology
• ProShieldESD FAQs
• Static in Motion – Why ESD Is a Continuous Process
• Static Dissipative vs Conductive Coating

Why Choose SCH Services?

SCH Services supports customers with practical coating selection, substrate evaluation, ESD coating trials, process development and production coating services.

For ProShieldESD applications, we can help assess the substrate, define the target resistance range, prepare test samples, measure performance and develop a practical coating route for production use.

• Explore the ProShieldESD coating platform
• Review ProShieldESD coating services
• Contact SCH to discuss testing and validation

This page provides general technical guidance based on live demonstration testing and practical ESD coating experience. Final material selection, resistance targets, coating process parameters and acceptance criteria should be validated against the relevant standards, customer specifications, environmental conditions and production qualification tests for the intended application.

At SCH Services Ltd, excellence does not happen by accident. It is built deliberately through consistent processes, clear thinking, and the right people doing the right things.

At the core of how we work are three simple pillars: training, trust and technology.

In the world of conformal coating, Parylene deposition and ESD control, the smallest details matter. Coating performance, long-term reliability and process consistency do not come from materials alone. They come from the people and systems behind them.

This approach is designed to improve coating process reliability, reduce defects, and ensure consistent results across production.

Training: Building Real Capability

Reliable coating results start with people who understand both the process and the reason behind it.

At SCH, training is not treated as a one-off exercise. It is built into how we operate day to day, developing practical capability across coating, masking, demasking, inspection and Parylene application.

• Structured training pathways that build skills progressively
• Competency tracking to support consistency across operators and processes
• Cross-functional awareness so each stage of the process is understood, not isolated

The outcome is simple: fewer defects, better repeatability and operators who understand what good work actually looks like.

Trust: Creating Ownership, Not Just Activity

Process control does not come from supervision alone. It comes from ownership.

At SCH, trust is built into how teams work. People are given responsibility for outcomes, not just instructions to follow.

• Clear accountability at each stage of the process
• Open communication between production, quality and engineering
• A working environment where problems are surfaced and solved, not hidden

When people take ownership of quality, consistency improves naturally. That shows in delivery performance, reliability and the ability to handle complex or high-risk coating work.

Technology: Supporting Precision and Consistency

The third pillar is technology, but not for its own sake.

From selective coating systems and UV inspection through to Parylene vacuum deposition and ProShield ESD control, technology at SCH is used to support process control, not replace it.

• Reducing variation across batches and operators
• Tracking performance through measurable quality and efficiency data
• Maintaining consistency even under production pressure

The focus is always the same: use the right tools to make the process more stable, more repeatable and easier to control.

Key point: Good coating work is not just a material choice. It depends on trained people, controlled systems and a culture where quality is owned at every stage.

Where It Comes Together

The real value comes when training, trust and technology work together.

• Trained operators use equipment correctly and consistently
• Trusted teams take responsibility for quality at every stage
• Controlled systems reduce variation and support repeatable outcomes

That combination is what enables SCH to deliver reliable coating performance across a wide range of applications, from complex electronics to high-reliability industrial environments.

The SCH Way

At its core, SCH is a practical, process-driven business.

Whether the requirement is conformal coating, Parylene or ESD control, the approach remains consistent: train properly, trust people to deliver, and use technology to support control, not replace it.

That is what sits behind consistent results, and why customers rely on SCH for work where reliability matters.

Related SCH Services

• Conformal Coating Solutions
• Parylene Coating Solutions
• ProShield ESD Coating
• Training & Process Support

Why Choose SCH Services?

SCH supports customers with coating services, process development, training and technical support across conformal coating, Parylene, advanced functional coatings and ESD control. Our approach is practical, process-led and focused on consistent results.

• 🛡️ Process-Led Coating Support – Practical support built around real production requirements.
• 📏 Controlled Application Knowledge – Experience across masking, coating, inspection, Parylene and ESD control.
• 📈 Training and Capability Building – Support for operators, engineers and production teams.
• 🔗 Integrated Coating Strategy – Ability to connect materials, processes, equipment and production needs.

📞 Call: +44 (0)1226 249019 | ✉ Email: sales@schservices.com | 💬 Discuss Your Requirement ›

Disclaimer: This content is provided for general technical and business guidance only. Coating selection, process design and production decisions should be validated against the specific application, operating environment and relevant customer or industry requirements.

Rework is not just unavoidable — it is one of the biggest hidden cost drivers in conformal coating and Parylene processing.

In practice, the method used for rework often determines whether a defect is corrected in seconds or becomes a multi-step process involving stripping, cleaning, drying and re-inspection.

Across both liquid conformal coating services and Parylene services, the same pattern appears repeatedly: the real limitation is rarely whether the coating can be removed. The real limitation is how controlled, repeatable and localised the removal method is.

This matters because rework is where many otherwise stable coating processes lose time, create board damage, or introduce new variability. For a broader overview of removal options, see our guide to conformal coating removal methods.

Quick take. The biggest rework problem is not whether removal is possible. It is whether the removal method gives consistent control without damaging pads, solder mask, plated surfaces or adjacent components. That is why micro-abrasive removal has become so important in both conformal coating and Parylene rework.

What we see in real production

Across coating services, rework typically falls into two broad categories:

• Liquid coatings such as acrylic, polyurethane and silicone — often removable, but time is lost in softening, cleaning, rinsing, drying and local touch-up.
• Parylene — chemically resistant and extremely thin, which makes traditional removal slow, inconsistent and highly operator-dependent when done manually.

In both cases, rework can be triggered by missed masking, exposed keep-out areas, engineering changes, inspection findings, soldering access requirements or local repair work. The problem is not unusual. It is routine.

The engineering challenge is therefore not “how do we avoid rework completely?” but “how do we make rework fast, localised, safe and repeatable?”

Why traditional rework methods slow the process down

In practice, most liquid conformal coating rework is carried out using chemical stripping, while Parylene removal often falls back to manual methods due to its chemical resistance. Both approaches can work, but they introduce limitations in control, consistency and process time.

Wet chemical stripping (liquid coatings)

• Primary method for acrylics and polyurethanes using local or full stripping processes
• Requires dwell time for softening, followed by cleaning and rinse stages
• Introduces risk of under-component ingress if not tightly controlled
• Can affect labels, plastics, adhesives and connector materials
• Adds process steps (strip → clean → dry → inspect) which increase cycle time

Manual removal (primarily Parylene and localised cases)

• Parylene is highly resistant to chemical stripping, so manual removal is often used
• Knives and fibre pens tend to drag rather than create clean exposure areas
• High risk of damaging pads, plating or solder mask
• Strong operator dependency and poor repeatability
• Time increases rapidly on fine-pitch or dense assemblies

Local scraping on liquid coatings (limited use cases)

• Sometimes used for small local repairs or silicone coatings where stripping is less practical
• Generally avoided for production rework due to damage risk and inconsistency

Across all methods, removal is usually achievable — but control, repeatability and process efficiency are often the real limitations.

Practical warning sign. If rework time varies dramatically between operators, boards or shifts, the issue is often not the coating chemistry itself. It is the removal method and how much operator judgement it depends on.

Why micro-abrasive blasting changes the equation

Micro-abrasive blasting addresses a specific bottleneck that appears across both liquid and Parylene rework: controlled, localised removal without chemical soak, blade pressure or thermal stress.

Using systems such as the Vaniman ProBlast 3 ESD, operators can expose solder joints, connector edges, test points and local repair areas by eroding the coating layer rather than softening it chemically or cutting it mechanically.

This matters because the rework step becomes much closer to a controlled process than an operator-dependent workaround.

For structured guidance on where micro-abrasion sits alongside chemical and manual methods, see the Removal & Rework Hub.

What the Vaniman ProBlast actually does well

The ProBlast is not an industrial sandblaster. It is a controlled micro-abrasion system intended for delicate removal work on electronics. In practice, its value comes from a few specific advantages:

• Foot-pedal control for consistent on/off blasting
• Adjustable pressure and media flow for local process tuning
• Dry removal with integrated debris extraction
• No heat and no solvent exposure
• Applicability across both liquid coatings and Parylene removal workflows

The key point is not that it removes coatings. It is that it can remove them locally, quickly and with much better repeatability than manual scraping or wet stripping in many rework situations.

Why rework fails in practice

The biggest rework issue is not removal. It is control.

• Over-removal damages solder mask or pads
• Under-removal leaves contamination or poor surfaces for re-coating
• Wet methods introduce ingress, drying and residue risks
• Manual methods create strong operator-to-operator variation
• Slow rework encourages “good enough” decision-making under production pressure

This is why rework often becomes one of the least stable parts of the coating process. It sits outside the main recipe but still has a major effect on yield, labour cost and downstream reliability.

For a wider process view of how repeatability is lost in coating operations, see Why Conformal Coating Processes Fail.

ProBlast vs wet stripping vs scraping

Feature	ProBlast	Chemical Stripping	Manual Scraping
Works on Parylene?	Yes	Usually no / limited	Yes, but slow
Time per rework	Fast	Medium to slow	Slow
Risk of board damage	Low when controlled properly	Medium	High
Cleanliness	Dry, extracted	Wet, requires post-cleaning	Debris and fibres possible
Operator dependence	Lower	Medium	High
Safety burden	No solvents	Chemical handling and waste	Blade injury / debris risk

Where the time saving actually comes from

When people say micro-abrasive blasting can cut rework time by up to 50%, the value is not just in faster coating removal. The time saving usually comes from eliminating secondary steps:

• No soak time waiting for chemical softening
• No rinse and dry stage after local stripping
• Less manual cutting and local board handling
• Cleaner transition into re-soldering, repair or inspection

In other words, the gain is process simplification, not just media speed.

What This Means in Practice

Rework is no longer a side issue in coating operations. It is part of the real process architecture. The removal method chosen will strongly influence labour time, operator consistency, local damage risk and the quality of the recovered surface.

For liquid coatings, this often means deciding when wet stripping is still justified and when dry local removal is the better route. For Parylene, it often means recognising that manual scraping may be technically possible but operationally poor.

This is how modern coating operations move from “rework as a workaround” to rework as a controlled process step.

Where this fits in the wider coating system

Rework links directly to masking quality, inspection effectiveness, local defect interpretation and removal method selection. That is why it should not be treated as an isolated repair function.

In practice, teams get better results when rework is planned as part of the coating process rather than left to operator improvisation after defects are found.

For the wider technical structure around removal, local stripping and process selection, use the Removal & Rework Hub.

Why Choose SCH Services?

SCH works across both liquid conformal coating and Parylene processing, so our view of rework is based on real production behaviour rather than theory alone. We support customers with coating removal strategy, process review, micro-abrasive removal systems, training and practical rework support.

• 🛠️ Removal method selection – choosing the right route for liquid coatings, Parylene and local repair tasks.
• 🎓 Training and process support – helping operators make rework more repeatable and less damaging.
• 🔧 Equipment and service support – including Vaniman ProBlast systems and practical coating removal guidance.

📞 Call: +44 (0)1226 249019 | ✉ Email: sales@schservices.com | 💬 Contact Us ›

Note: This insight provides general technical guidance only. Final removal method, process controls, board-level risk and validation decisions must be confirmed against the coating type, component sensitivity, customer specification and applicable standards.

Controlling electrostatic discharge is not achieved by one product, coating or material. It is normally built as a system of layers: grounding, conductive pathways, dissipative working surfaces and anti-static measures that reduce charge generation.

The ESD Control Pyramid is a useful way to visualise this. Grounding forms the base, conductive and dissipative materials provide controlled charge movement, and anti-static measures help reduce charge build-up at the top of the system.

The ProShieldESD coating platform fits into this structure by converting existing surfaces into controlled conductive or static-dissipative materials, depending on the application requirement.

The Base: Grounding and Conductive Materials

At the base of the pyramid is grounding. Conductive materials provide a low-resistance path that allows charge to move towards a defined ground point.

In practical ESD control, the aim is not simply to make everything as conductive as possible. The aim is to create a controlled discharge path that avoids uncontrolled charge accumulation while also avoiding damaging rapid discharge events.

Grounding and verification are normally managed within a wider ESD control programme, often using standards such as IEC 61340 or ANSI/ESD S20.20 as part of the control framework.

How ProShieldESD Helps

ProShieldESD can be engineered into conductive-range coatings where a defined pathway to ground is required. This can be useful for fixtures, housings, equipment surfaces, floors or other components where replacing the base material with a conductive alternative would be expensive or impractical.

The Middle: Static-Dissipative Materials

The middle of the pyramid is where many real ESD control applications sit. Static-dissipative materials are used to control how charge moves, rather than allowing it to remain trapped or discharge too quickly.

This is especially important in electronics manufacturing, precision assembly, aerospace, medical device production, packaging, handling systems and other environments where uncontrolled electrostatic behaviour can create quality, safety or reliability problems.

For many applications, dissipative behaviour is more useful than maximum conductivity. This is why understanding the difference between static-dissipative and conductive surfaces is important before selecting a coating strategy.

How ProShieldESD Helps

ProShieldESD coatings provide controlled dissipative performance across a wide range of substrates. Unlike conventional filler-loaded systems, the platform is based on intrinsically conductive polymer technology, reducing the risks associated with filler distribution, uneven behaviour and performance drift.

The Top: Anti-Static Measures

Anti-static measures sit at the top of the pyramid. Their role is to reduce charge generation, often by minimising friction, separation and triboelectric charging.

Anti-static measures can be useful, but they do not always provide a complete control system on their own. If charge is still generated, the system must still provide a route for controlled dissipation or grounding.

How ProShieldESD Helps

ProShieldESD supports anti-static strategies by giving surfaces a controlled electrical behaviour. If charge appears during handling, airflow, movement or contact, the coated surface can help dissipate or conduct that charge as part of the wider ESD control system.

Why the Pyramid Matters

The pyramid helps prevent a common mistake: assuming that higher conductivity automatically means better static control.

In reality, different parts of an ESD control system need different behaviours. Some areas need a defined path to ground. Some need controlled dissipation. Some need reduced charge generation. The wrong choice can create new risks, especially where sensitive electronics, powders, solvents, plastics or moving equipment are involved.

For a wider decision framework, see how to choose the right static control approach.

The operating environment also matters. Humidity, contamination, wear, cleaning, substrate type and grounding design can all influence ESD performance. This is why electrostatic behaviour depends on the environment, not only the coating material.

Why ProShieldESD Is Different from Traditional ESD Paints and Plastics

Traditional ESD paints and moulded conductive plastics can be useful, but both have limitations.

• Filler-loaded paints can suffer from uneven filler distribution, surface variation, appearance issues and performance drift.
• Moulded ESD plastics can require expensive tooling, minimum order quantities and design changes.
• Topical anti-static treatments may depend on migration, humidity or repeated reapplication.

ProShieldESD provides a different route by upgrading the surface behaviour of existing materials. This can reduce the need for specialist moulded materials and allows ESD control to be added to plastics, foams, housings, fixtures, work surfaces, packaging and industrial equipment.

This approach also supports retrofit projects where the existing part, surface or process is already fixed and cannot easily be redesigned.

Where ProShieldESD Fits in the Pyramid

ProShieldESD can support several layers of the ESD Control Pyramid:

• Conductive-range coatings for defined grounding pathways.
• Static-dissipative coatings for controlled charge movement across working surfaces.
• Surface upgrades for plastics, foams, fixtures, packaging and equipment.
• Retrofit ESD control where replacing the base material is not practical.
• Support for anti-static environments by giving surfaces controlled electrical behaviour.

This makes ProShieldESD a practical engineering option where static control must be added to real products, production equipment or industrial surfaces without redesigning the complete system.

Related ProShieldESD Guidance

• ProShieldESD Coating Platform
• ProShieldESD Solutions
• How to Choose the Right Static Control Approach
• Static-Dissipative vs Conductive Coating
• Why ESD Behaviour Depends on the Environment
• Dispelling the Myths About Static Control Paints

Need Help Selecting the Right ESD Coating Strategy?

SCH can help assess where static charge is being generated, how it needs to be controlled, and whether the surface should be conductive, static-dissipative or supported by other ESD control measures.

Use the ProShieldESD coating platform to explore the technology, or contact SCH to discuss a specific surface, material or operating environment.

Contact SCH Services

Technical note: This article provides general technical guidance only. Final ESD control decisions should be validated against the application, substrate, grounding design, operating environment and relevant site or industry standards.