Mon - Thur 7.30-15.30   Fri 7.30-14.00

Parylene Coating for Stent Frames & Fine Metal Structures


Introduction

Fine-feature metal structures such as stent frames and other micro-machined components present unique challenges in conformal coating. While Parylene deposition is inherently conformal, the real engineering work is usually in preparation discipline, repeatable presentation and fixturing, thickness control and inspection strategy.

This technical insight outlines practical considerations when coating small metal lattice or tubular structures, without assuming a regulated end-use and without relying on application-specific claims.

Infographic: Key Engineering Considerations

Infographic showing engineering considerations for Parylene coating of stent frames and fine metal structures including surface preparation, fixturing, thickness control and inspection.

Engineering considerations when applying ultra-thin Parylene coatings to fine-feature metal components.

This infographic summarises the key engineering controls required when applying Parylene to micro-structured metal components, including geometry sensitivity, surface preparation discipline and inspection methodology.

1) Geometry and Surface-Area Effects

Micro-structured components typically have a very high surface-area-to-mass ratio. This influences deposition consistency and the sensitivity of results to small variations in handling and contamination. Key considerations include:

  • Stability of deposition rate across very small loads
  • Local thickness variation across tight lattice features
  • Handling sensitivity during loading and unloading
  • Batch repeatability driven by spacing and presentation

Although Parylene polymerises conformally, orientation and spacing still influence consistency across a batch. Repeatable fixturing is therefore critical.

2) Surface Preparation of Metal Substrates

For metals commonly used in precision components, such as stainless steel, aluminium alloys, cobalt chrome or shape-memory alloys including nitinol, coating reliability is strongly linked to surface condition. Typical process controls include:

  • Removal of machining oils, polishing compounds and handling residues
  • Controlled drying to reduce moisture carryover
  • Particulate control following any abrasive or finishing step
  • Consistent adhesion promotion where required

Because ultra-thin polymer films are unforgiving, minor surface contamination or moisture carryover can significantly affect adhesion and long-term performance. The most reliable results come from disciplined handling, documented preparation steps and prevention of re-contamination between stages.

3) Fixturing and Orientation

How a component is supported inside the deposition chamber directly impacts contact marks, shadowing risk and run-to-run reproducibility. Effective fixturing aims to:

  • Minimise contact points and avoid critical functional areas
  • Maintain consistent spacing between parts
  • Prevent movement during pump-down and deposition
  • Enable repeatable loading practices for process control

For small tubular or lattice components, suspended or end-supported configurations are often preferred to reduce contact artefacts and ensure uniform exposure of complex geometry.

4) Thickness Selection and Control

Film thickness should be selected based on the required function, such as barrier performance, flexibility and dimensional tolerance. Achieving consistent thickness on micro parts relies on disciplined control of:

  • Material loading calculations
  • Chamber stability and repeatable batch configuration
  • Verification using witness coupons and documented inspection checks

For more detailed guidance on thickness considerations, see our article: Parylene Thickness & Environmental Protection: How Much Is Enough?

5) Inspection and Quality Checks

Inspection of fine metal components typically involves magnified visual assessment for:

  • Coverage continuity
  • Pinhole or void indications
  • Foreign inclusions or particulates
  • Handling damage or contact marking

Where coating removal or selective rework is required on precision components, a controlled approach is essential. For broader rework considerations, see our Removal & Rework Hub.

Practical Next Step

Discuss your application

If you are evaluating Parylene for fine-feature metal parts and would like a process-focused discussion around geometry, fixturing and thickness targets, our engineering team can assist.

Parylene Coating Services

Related Resources

FAQs

Is Parylene suitable for very small metal lattice structures?

Yes. Parylene deposition is conformal and capable of coating fine features uniformly. However, surface preparation, contamination control and repeatable fixturing play a critical role in achieving consistent results.

Does part orientation matter during Parylene deposition?

Yes. While Parylene is not line-of-sight limited, orientation and spacing influence repeatability and reduce the risk of contact artefacts or localised non-uniformity across a batch.

What metals can be coated with Parylene?

Parylene is commonly applied to a range of metals used in precision engineering, including stainless steels, aluminium alloys, nickel-containing alloys and shape-memory alloys such as nitinol. Final performance depends on preparation discipline and intended service environment.

Anti-Static Fan Coating: What Actually Works on Rotating Plastic Blades?


Industrial fans used in electronics, hazardous areas and process environments are sometimes specified as β€œanti-static” or β€œESD safe.” In practice, achieving stable static control on a rotating component is more complex than simply applying a dissipative ESD coating system.

Why Static Control on Fans Is Different

Unlike flat panels or housings, fans are continuously rotating, exposed to airflow abrasion and dust loading, and mechanically stressed at blade roots. Any anti-static fan coating must maintain electrical performance under dynamic conditions β€” not just pass an initial surface resistivity test.

This infographic summarises the key engineering risks when specifying anti-static fan coating for rotating equipment.

Anti-static fan coating infographic showing ESD coating durability, adhesion and surface resistivity stability on rotating plastic fan blades

Infographic summarising the engineering challenges of applying anti-static (ESD) coating to rotating plastic fan blades, including adhesion, abrasion resistance and grounding continuity.

What β€œAnti-Static” Actually Means

In engineering terms, anti-static usually refers to a surface resistivity in the dissipative range (commonly 10⁢–10⁹ Ξ©/sq, depending on application and standard). On rotating components, three additional factors often determine whether it actually works in service:

  • Electrical continuity to ground (a coating alone is not a grounding strategy)
  • Stability of resistivity under wear (erosion changes performance)
  • Environmental durability (humidity, temperature, airborne contamination)

Without a reliable ground path, even a well-applied dissipative coating may not control charge effectively.

Common Failure Modes on Coated Fans

In practice, issues typically fall into one (or more) of these categories:

  • Resistivity drift – electrical performance changes over time.
  • Edge wear – coating erodes at blade tips due to airflow abrasion.
  • Adhesion loss – coating lifts from low surface energy plastics or contaminated surfaces.
  • Inconsistent coverage – uneven film build affecting balance and durability.

For background on surface-energy and contamination-driven mechanisms, see the Conformal Coating Defects Hub and the specific defect pages for de-wetting and poor adhesion on plastics / connector bodies.

Material Selection Considerations

When coating fan blades, the substrate type is critical. Low surface energy polymers (e.g., PP/PE) present adhesion challenges similar to those discussed in our Insight on ESD coating on silicone keyboards (different polymer, similar β€œlow surface energy” reality).

Where coating is feasible, success typically depends on controlled surface preparation and verification, for example:

  • Surface activation (plasma or corona) where appropriate
  • Controlled film thickness and repeatable application method (see the Processes Hub)
  • Verification of balance and vibration post-application
  • Surface resistivity measurement and acceptance criteria (see the Inspection & Quality Hub)
  • Electrical continuity / grounding validation in the assembled product

Mechanical Balance Matters

Coating thickness must be tightly controlled. Even small asymmetries can alter rotational balance, increase bearing load, and shorten service life. This is often overlooked during prototyping.

Engineering Insight: Define β€œWorking” Early

When a project is β€œprogressing well,” it is worth clarifying what has actually been proven:

  • Has surface resistivity been measured after environmental exposure?
  • Has performance been tested at operational RPM and duty cycle?
  • Has grounding continuity been verified in the final assembly?
  • Has wear been assessed after extended runtime?

Static control on moving components must be validated under real operating conditions β€” not just laboratory conditions.

If you are evaluating anti-static coating on rotating components, we can advise on structured validation routes and realistic performance criteria based on the end-use requirements.


Related Insights:

Can ESD Coatings Adhere to Silicone Keyboards?


Silicone components (keypads, seals, flexible housings) are common in industrial and hazardous-area products, but silicone is one of the most challenging substrates to coat reliably. If you are considering an ESD (dissipative) coating system on a silicone keyboard, it is important to understand the adhesion risks and what is realistically achievable. Short answer: Silicone can be coated, but adhesion is not guaranteed without surface activation and structured validation testing.

Why Silicone Is Difficult to Coat

ESD coating adhesion on silicone keyboard infographic showing surface energy challenges, plasma treatment and silicone primer solutions

Infographic explaining why silicone keyboards are difficult to coat with ESD coatings and the surface preparation methods typically required for reliable adhesion.

Silicone elastomers have very low surface energy, making ESD coating adhesion to silicone particularly difficult without specialist preparation. In practice, this means most coatings will not bond well to untreated silicone, and common β€œplastic primers” designed for PP/PVC/ABS generally do not work on silicone.

For deeper background on adhesion failure mechanisms (including low surface energy and contamination-driven pull-back), see:

Related Insight (real-world case): De-wetting seen after cleaning (when β€˜clean’ isn’t clean enough).

Can ProShieldESD Adhere to Silicone?

With our current ProShieldESD material range, adhesion to silicone cannot be guaranteed. If silicone is mandatory, the project should be treated as an R&D / validation exercise rather than a standard production supply.

What Usually Makes Silicone Coating Possible

Where coating on silicone is required, reliable adhesion typically depends on specialist surface preparation and validation testing. Common technical routes include:

  • Plasma surface activation (often the most effective route)
  • Corona treatment
  • Specialist silicone adhesion promoters (e.g., silane-based systems designed for silicone elastomers)

Even with surface activation, durability must be proven under real use conditions.

Flexibility and Durability Matter for Keyboards

Silicone keyboards are designed to flex repeatedly. Any coating system must be evaluated for flex-cracking, wear, and stability of electrical performance over the expected actuation life. (For a coating durability analogue in electronics, see Cracking (Defects Hub) and the related Insight below.)

Engineering Insight: Challenge the Substrate Choice Early

Before investing time in coating trials, it is worth asking a simple but high-impact question: does the component have to be silicone, or could an alternative elastomer be used? In many applications, selecting a more β€œcoatable” substrate can reduce risk, simplify processing, and improve long-term reliability.

If you are assessing a silicone keyboard for ESD performance, we can advise on practical trial routes and realistic success criteria based on the end-use requirements.


Related Insights:

Restoring ESD Performance on PVC Conveyor Belts – Without Replacement


A manufacturing customer operating an electronics assembly line identified that their PVC conveyor belt surface had drifted out of ESD compliance over time.

Measured surface resistivity had increased to:

>109 Ξ©/sq

At this level, the belt was behaving as an insulator rather than a static dissipative surface β€” introducing electrostatic risk in a controlled production environment.

Full belt replacement was possible, but would have involved production downtime, mechanical removal, and significant cost. SCH proposed an alternative: on-site restoration using a flexible ProShieldESD coating platform.

Before and after comparison of PVC conveyor belt restored using flexible ProShieldESD conductive coating in electronics assembly line

Original PVC conveyor belt (left foreground) compared with newly applied flexible conductive coating (right), restoring surface resistivity from >109 Ξ©/sq to 106–107 Ξ©/sq without belt removal.

Substrate & Conditions

  • Substrate: Flexible PVC conveyor belt
  • Environment: Active assembly line
  • Requirement: Maintain flexibility and mechanical durability
  • Application constraint: No belt removal

Technical Solution

A new two-part flexible conductive coating variant (within the ProShieldESD platform) was applied directly to the belt surface. Application was carried out via our ProShieldESD subcontract coating services, enabling in-situ refurbishment without mechanical disruption.

Application Method

  • Surface cleaned with mild solvent
  • No primer required
  • Roller-applied in situ
  • Belt remained installed
  • Functional resistivity confirmed within 2–3 hours

Performance Outcome

Post-application surface resistivity:

106 – 107 Ξ©/sq

This returned the surface into the static dissipative range, suitable for electronics assembly environments. For more detail on conductive polymer behaviour and how ProShieldESD differs from conventional ESD paints, see the ProShieldESD FAQs.

Additional Technical Advantages

  • Fully flexible after cure
  • Mechanically durable
  • Localised repair possible (scratch-visible indicator)
  • No complex tooling required

Engineering Value

This approach demonstrates a practical refurbishment model for flexible plastic ESD surfaces where:

  • Conductive fillers in the original belt degrade over time
  • Cleaning cycles reduce surface performance
  • Capital replacement costs are disproportionate

Instead of replacing mechanical infrastructure, the ESD performance layer can be reinstated as a coating system.

Conclusion

This field beta installation confirms that flexible PVC conveyor systems can be restored to static dissipative performance without removal or downtime-heavy replacement.

For facilities managing ageing ESD flooring, mats or conveyor systems, this represents a significant process and cost advantage.

Cracked Conformal Coating After Thermal Cycling β€” A Process Reality Check


Cracking of conformal coating is most often discovered not during initial inspection, but after thermal cycling, environmental testing, or extended service exposure.

In field investigations, cracking is rarely caused by a single factor. Instead, it is usually the result of combined stresses, such as excessive coating thickness, rigid material selection, and differential thermal expansion between the coating and substrate.

We commonly see cracking:

  • Over sharp component edges or solder fillets
  • Where coating thickness exceeds recommended limits
  • On assemblies exposed to wide thermal excursions

Importantly, coatings that appear compliant and defect-free at room temperature may still fail under thermal stress if thickness and material flexibility are not properly controlled.

A deeper technical breakdown of cracking mechanisms and prevention is available in our Defects Hub article on cracking in conformal coating.

De-Wetting Seen After Cleaning β€” When β€œClean” Isn’t Clean Enough


A common inspection finding is localised de-wetting of conformal coating, particularly on solder joints or around component leads, even when a cleaning process has been applied beforehand.

In many cases, the boards are genuinely clean in a visual sense. However, de-wetting is often caused by residues that are invisible to the naked eye β€” including low-level ionic contamination, surfactant residues from aqueous cleaning, or incompatible cleaning chemistries.

Typical characteristics include:

  • Circular pull-back around solder joints
  • Patchy coating coverage on ENIG or HASL finishes
  • Repeatable locations across multiple assemblies

Crucially, operators may notice the effect during coating but assume it is cosmetic. In reality, de-wetting is a strong indicator of a surface energy problem and should always trigger escalation and investigation rather than acceptance.

Detailed causes, acceptance criteria, and corrective actions are covered in our Defects Hub guidance on de-wetting in conformal coating.

Why Conformal Coating Wicks Along Wire Strands β€” A Field Observation


During inspection of coated assemblies, we occasionally observe conformal coating creeping along exposed wire strands well beyond the intended coated area. This is often flagged as β€œover-application”, but in practice the root cause is usually more subtle.

In this scenario, the coating is not flowing excessively during application. Instead, capillary forces draw low-viscosity material along fine wire strands, braid structures, or conductor interfaces after deposition. This effect is amplified where flux residues, incomplete cleaning, or high surface energy materials are present.

We most often see this behaviour:

  • At wire terminations and soldered pigtails
  • Where insulation stripping exposes fine conductor bundles
  • When low-viscosity acrylics or urethanes are used without sufficient flash-off

From a process perspective, this is not something that can be β€œsprayed out”. Masking strategy, cleanliness, and controlled flash times are far more influential than spray parameters alone.

For definitive technical guidance on this phenomenon, see our Defects Hub page on capillary wicking in conformal coating.

Masking-related defects causing coating ingress and poor boundaries on PCB assemblies

Why Masking Is the Leading Cause of Conformal Coating Defects


When conformal coating defects appear in production, the first response is often to adjust coating parameters such as viscosity, spray settings, cure profiles, or even material selection. In practice, many coating defects are introduced before coating begins.

Across aerospace, automotive, industrial, and electronics manufacturing, a significant proportion of NCRs and customer rejections trace back to masking decisions rather than coating chemistry. These failures typically occur at boundaries such as connectors, test points, interfaces, and defined keep-out zones.

Masking Defines Where Coating Is Allowed β€” and Where It Must Not Go

Masking is not a secondary preparation step. It is a primary process control that physically defines the limits of coating coverage. When masking is poorly selected, incorrectly applied, inadequately sealed, or inconsistently removed, defects will occur even when the coating process itself is stable and well controlled.

  • Coating ingress into keep-out zones
  • Coating lifted or removed during de-masking
  • Residue or contamination transferred from masking materials
  • Incomplete touch-up after mask removal
  • Ragged or inconsistent coating boundaries

Why Conformal Coating Masking Defects Are So Often Missed

Masking defects are frequently overlooked because they do not always present as obvious failures during application. The coating may appear uniform immediately after spraying or dipping, with problems only emerging later during inspection, electrical testing, or customer use.

  • No defined inspection step after de-masking
  • Assumptions that shields act as sealed barriers
  • Lack of clarity on operator touch-up versus escalation
  • Over-reliance on UV inspection alone
  • Ambiguous or poorly defined keep-out zones on drawings

Treat Masking as a Defect-Prevention System

Reducing conformal coating defects requires treating masking as a controlled system, not simply a consumable or materials choice.

  • Matching masking methods to function, such as shields versus sealed barriers
  • Controlling fit, placement, and sealing of tapes, boots, and custom shapes
  • Defining de-masking timing and removal techniques
  • Mandating post de-masking inspection
  • Applying clear rules for operator touch-up versus escalation

New Resource: Masking as a Root Cause of Coating Defects

A new root-cause article has been added to the Conformal Coating Defects Hub. It explains in detail why masking is the leading contributor to coating failures and how to control masking effectively in production.

To understand how masking contributes to coating failures in real production environments, read the full masking root-cause analysis.

If you are reviewing masking methods or addressing recurring coating NCRs, explore our conformal coating masking solutions.

Final Thought

If your coating process is stable but defects persist, the fastest improvement often comes not from changing the coating material or parameters, but from reviewing how and where masking is applied, removed, and verified.

Masking does not simply prepare a board for coating. It determines whether the coating process will succeed.

For support reviewing masking processes, inspection criteria, or escalation rules, contact our technical team.

Conformal coating consultancy services covering troubleshooting, process optimisation, benchmarking, NPI support and ongoing technical support

Conformal Coating Consultancy & Process Support


Troubleshooting, Process Optimisation & Benchmarking

SCH Services Ltd delivers expert conformal coating consultancy across liquid, nano, and Parylene coating processes. We support manufacturers at every stage β€” from material selection and new product introduction (NPI) through to troubleshooting, process optimisation, and formal benchmarking.

With over 25 years of hands-on industry experience, our consultancy is grounded in real production environments across aerospace, automotive, medical, defence, and industrial electronics. Clients rely on SCH to improve coating reliability, increase yield, strengthen compliance, and resolve complex coating challenges quickly and decisively.

For wider support including equipment, services, and training, explore our Conformal Coating Solutions and Inspection Training resources.

Our Conformal Coating Consultancy Services

Troubleshooting & Defect Resolution

We provide rapid, structured support for coating defects including adhesion failure, bubbles, contamination, de-wetting, and cure-related issues. Our troubleshooting approach aligns with IPC-A-610, IPC-CC-830, and ISO 9001, ensuring solutions are technically robust and audit-ready.

For common defect mechanisms and corrective actions, visit our Conformal Coating Defects Hub.

Process Optimisation

Our optimisation services focus on improving yield, repeatability, and throughput. This includes process tuning, equipment calibration, material compatibility checks, and verification of application and cure parameters.

If you are installing, upgrading, or validating equipment, view our Support Equipment solutions.

Benchmarking & Compliance Review

We benchmark coating processes against IPC standards, ISO 9001, and recognised global best practices to identify risk, variation, and improvement opportunities.

Benchmarking programmes can be paired with Inspection Training to ensure consistent interpretation, inspection discipline, and long-term process control.

New Product Introduction (NPI)

We support the seamless integration of conformal coating into new product launches, covering coating selection, process qualification, documentation, and inspection strategy. Our consultancy ensures coating requirements are correctly embedded from day one.

For end-to-end implementation, see Conformal Coating Solutions.

Ongoing Support Packages

  • Remote or onsite troubleshooting support
  • Regular process optimisation and audits
  • Compliance validation and technical documentation
  • Expert guidance on new materials, equipment, and coating technologies

Where outsourcing is preferred, explore our Subcontract Coating Services.

Why Choose SCH Services?

Partnering with SCH Services gives you access to a fully integrated platform covering Conformal Coating, Parylene, and ProShieldESD solutions, supported by equipment, materials, and training β€” all delivered by engineers with decades of real-world coating experience.

  • ✈️ 25+ Years of Expertise – Trusted specialists across aerospace, medical, defence, automotive, and electronics manufacturing.
  • πŸ› οΈ End-to-End Capability – From coating selection and masking strategy to inspection, rework, and ESD-safe solutions.
  • πŸ“ˆ Scalable Support – Consultancy and capacity that adapts from prototypes through to high-volume production.
  • 🌍 Global Reach – Technical support and supply coverage across Europe, North America, and Asia.
  • βœ… Proven Reliability – A reputation built on quality, consistency, and long-term customer trust.

πŸ“ž Call: +44 (0)1226 249019 Β | βœ‰ Email: sales@schservices.comΒ  | Β πŸ’¬ Contact Us β€Ί

Why do so many conformal coating problems appear β€œrandom”?


Why Conformal Coating Problems Often Appear Random β€” And Why They Aren’t

In most cases, they aren’t random at all β€” they are symptoms of a process that was never aligned from the start. Conformal coating only works reliably when PCB design, environmental demands, coating chemistry, application method and inspection strategy all work together as a unified system.

To help manufacturers establish stable, scalable and predictable coating processes, we’ve published a fully updated guide:

πŸ‘‰Β Holistic Conformal Coating Process – End-to-End Framework

Below is a high-level summary. For the full technical model, diagrams and linked resources, explore the article above.

1. It all begins with PCB design

Most coating challenges originate at the design stage β€” long before production starts. Poor keep-outs, difficult orientations, insufficient drain paths or incompatible materials lead to:

  • excessive masking
  • rework and inspection delays
  • pooling, edge thinning and trapped solvent
  • long-term reliability risks

A design that supports coating reduces cost and improves first-pass yield.

Explore the Design for Conformal Coating Hub:

πŸ‘‰Β Design Hub Articles

2. Chemistry must be matched to the real environment

No coating is universally suitable. Chemistry selection should be driven by environmental stress, including:

  • humidity and condensation
  • SOβ‚‚Β / Hβ‚‚S corrosion
  • fuels, oils, chemicals and solvents
  • UV exposure
  • thermal cycling and vibration
  • high-voltage creepage and clearance

Using the wrong chemistry often results in de-wetting, cracking, poor adhesion or long-term corrosion.

Explore:

πŸ‘‰Β Parylene Coating Solutions

πŸ‘‰Β ProShieldESD Conductive Polymer Platform

3. The application method must suit material, volume & geometry

Selective coating, manual spray, dip coating and Parylene each solve different process challenges. Selecting the wrong method leads to inconsistent thickness, material waste and increased labour.

Your method should reflect:

  • production volume
  • assembly density
  • design geometry
  • material selection
  • drainage capability
  • masking burden

See the Coating Process Hub Overview:

πŸ‘‰Β Coating Processes Hub

4. Material & process control prevent drift

Even well-designed processes degrade over time if material conditions are not tightly managed.

Small variations in:

  • viscosity
  • solvent balance
  • 2K mix ratio
  • temperature & humidity
  • flash-off or cure profile

…can create large deviations in coverage, edge definition, adhesion and repeatability.

Good material management is one of the strongest predictors of coating stability over time.

5. Inspection closes the loop

Inspection validates the process and ensures defects are caught before assemblies reach customers.

A robust inspection strategy should include:

  • UV contrast and coverage checks
  • thickness measurement (preferably with coupons)
  • adhesion and environmental tests
  • periodic functional/hi-pot checks

Explore the Inspection & Quality Hub:

πŸ‘‰Β Inspection & Quality Articles

SCH-manufactured UV Inspection Booths:

πŸ‘‰Β UV Inspection Booths

6. Continuous improvement keeps the process stable

Production changes, new PCB variants and supplier shifts all introduce risk. Without structured review, even a previously stable line can begin to drift.

SCH’s consultancy team provides:

  • NPI validation & materials benchmarking
  • full process audits
  • defect pattern analysis
  • SPC review & control planning
  • design alignment and masking strategy optimisation

Explore:

πŸ‘‰Β Conformal Coating Consultancy

7. When Parylene is the smarter choice

For certain assemblies, liquid coatings will never deliver the required performance. Parylene excels when:

  • geometries are complex
  • components are closely packed
  • surfaces are hidden, recessed or sharp-edged
  • moisture protection must be absolute
  • very high electrical resistance or stability is required
  • field reliability is mission-critical

Explore:

πŸ‘‰Β Parylene Coating Services

πŸ‘‰Β Parylene Deposition Systems

8. Why the holistic model matters

Failures rarely originate in the coating booth. They arise from misalignment of design, chemistry, application method or environment.

Symptoms include:

  • dewetting
  • fisheyes and pinholes
  • inconsistent thickness
  • chronic masking leakage
  • pooling and edge thinning
  • delamination and poor adhesion

These issues often appear random β€” yet almost always stem from upstream decisions.

Explore the full Coating Defects Hub:

πŸ‘‰Β Common Coating Defects

9. SCH’s Total Solutions Approach

Whether you coat in-house or outsource, SCH provides full lifecycle support across both liquid coatings and Parylene.

⭐ In-house coating support

⭐ Outsourced coating services

Explore:

πŸ‘‰Β Total Conformal Coating Solutions

πŸ”Β Read the full technical framework

This blog provides a high-level summary only. For the complete methodology, diagrams, commercial considerations and cross-linked technical resources, view the full article:

πŸ‘‰Β Holistic Conformal Coating Process – Full Guide

0
  • Your current order total is £0.00 β€” you must have an order with a minimum of £75.00 to place your order.
0
Your Cart
Your cart is empty
  • Your current order total is £0.00 β€” you must have an order with a minimum of £75.00 to place your order.
Calculate Shipping
  • Your current order total is £0.00 β€” you must have an order with a minimum of £75.00 to place your order.

Conformal Coating UK

Technical banner showing PCB and process icons representing conformal coating, masking, inspection and training on the SCH technical knowledge hub.
Conformal Coating UK
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.