Intercoat Adhesion Failure in Conformal Coating

Intercoat adhesion failure is a conformal coating defect where a second coat (or local touch-up) does not bond to the first, causing peel-back, flaking, edge lift, wrinkling, or delamination between layers. It is usually driven by recoat timing, partial cure state, surface contamination, or chemical incompatibility between coats.

For a complete index of defect types and links to each technical article, use the Conformal Coating Defects Hub.

Intercoat adhesion failure in conformal coating showing peeling between coats caused by missed recoat window, contamination, and incomplete cure
Intercoat adhesion failure (recoating defect): peel-back and separation between coating layersβ€”commonly caused by missed recoat windows, contamination between coats, or an unstable cure state that prevents the second layer bonding properly.

What Intercoat Adhesion Failure Looks Like

  • Peel-back or flaking of the second coat, often at touch-up edges or overlap zones.
  • Layer separation where the top film can be lifted without disturbing the base coat.
  • Edge lift after de-masking where a touch-up coat bridges onto a previously cured film.
  • Wrinkling/rippling that appears only after recoating (often indicates recoat window or solvent interaction).
  • β€œTwo-tone” adhesion: one pass bonds, another pass fails (frequently contamination or cure drift).

Intercoat failures are high-risk because the coating may look β€œcovered” but can create hidden moisture pathways at the interface and can fail during handling, vibration, or thermal cycling.

↑ Back to Quick Links

Root Causes (Most Common Mechanisms)

1) Recoat window violated (too soon or too late)

Recoating too soon can trap solvent or disturb a soft film; recoating too late can mean the surface is fully cured and no longer receptive to bonding without activation.

2) Partial cure / skinning (surface feels β€œdry” but isn’t cured)

A skinned surface can look acceptable but still contains solvent or reactive species underneath. Recoating can cause intercoat shear, waviness, or weak adhesion. Cross-check Under-cure.

3) Contamination between coats

Common sources include masking residue, handling oils, airborne dust, silicone transfer, cleaning residue, or β€œtack cloth” contamination. If you see circular pull-back, also check Fish-Eyes & Craters.

4) Chemical incompatibility or solvent attack of the base coat

Some solvents can re-soften a cured coating, creating a weak boundary layer. This overlaps with Wrinkling / Recoat Defects and, on sensitive substrates, Solvent Attack.

↑ Back to Quick Links

Fast Checks (Diagnose in Minutes)

  1. Where does it occur? If it’s only at overlap/touch-up edges, suspect recoat window or contamination between coats.
  2. Lift test at the interface: Can the top layer be peeled while the base layer stays attached? That’s classic intercoat failure.
  3. Process history check: Was there a delay, shift change, bake/cure interruption, or masking removed/reapplied before touch-up?
  4. Contamination check: Identify β€œlast touch” between coats (gloves, fixtures, compressed air, dust exposure, masking residue).
  5. Cure state check: If the base coat is soft/tacky, route to Under-cure first.

If the second coat shows wrinkling/rippling rather than peel-back, treat it as a recoat film-formation problem and cross-check Wrinkling / Recoat Defects.

↑ Back to Quick Links

Prevention (What Actually Works in Production)

Lock the recoat rules

  • Define the recoat window (minimum and maximum) and treat it as a controlled process requirement.
  • Standardise touch-up timing after de-masking (don’t allow β€œwhenever it’s convenient”).
  • Control film build: heavy recoats raise solvent dwell and increase interface risk.

Control what happens between coats

  • No-silicone rules, glove discipline, and clean fixtures for all handling after first coat.
  • Protect WIP from dust/FOD (covered storage, defined dwell times).
  • Masking residue control: if de-masking leaves adhesive residue, fix the masking method (don’t β€œclean and hope”).

Validate cure stability

  • Keep time/temperature/UV dose stable within a validated window (drift creates intercoat variability).
  • Where required, qualify surface activation/scuff/solvent wipe steps as a controlled process (not operator preference).

Tie prevention back to upstream control: Processes Hub, Masking Hub, and Inspection & Quality Hub.

↑ Back to Quick Links

Rework & Repair Rules (When You Find It)

  • Do not β€œcoat over a failed interface”: recoating on top of intercoat failure usually peels again.
  • Remove back to a sound edge: strip until the remaining film is firmly bonded and stable.
  • Restore the surface condition: clean/activate per your approved method before recoating.
  • Escalate if repeatable: if multiple boards show the same interface failure, treat it as a process-window or contamination event.

For structured removal and rework methods, use the Removal & Rework Hub.

↑ Back to Quick Links

Training on Recoat Windows & Adhesion Failures

SCH delivers conformal coating training focused on real production failure modesβ€”recoating windows, cure-state control, contamination transfer, masking discipline, and repair rules aligned to IPC expectations and customer requirements.

Explore Conformal Coating Training β†—

Industry Standards We Work To

SCH Services aligns coating services, training, equipment supply and materials to relevant IPC standards, including:

  • IPC-A-610 – Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies
  • IPC-CC-830 – Qualification & Performance of Conformal Coatings
  • IPC-HDBK-830 – Conformal Coating Handbook (guidance and best practice)

For further details on IPC standards:electronics.org/ipc-standards β†—

Explore Topic Hubs

Conformal Coating Processes Hub
Core coating processes (spray, dip, selective, brush) plus setup, control windows, and optimisation for repeatable results.

Open β†—

Conformal Coating Equipment Hub
Equipment selection, setup and best-practice for spray/booths, dip systems, valves and selective robotics.

Open β†—

Conformal Coating Masking Hub
Masking methods & materials (tapes, dots, boots, latex, custom shapes) and when to use barrier vs shielding.

Open β†—

Conformal Coating Design Hub
Design-for-coating guidance: keep-outs, spacing, creepage/clearance, drainage, inspection aids, and DfM/DfCC.

Open β†—

Conformal Coating Defects Hub
Defect mechanisms, root causes, diagnosis and prevention (pinholes, orange peel, de-wetting, delamination, cracking, corrosion, wicking, coverage, ingress, bridging, pooling, cure-state and recoat defects).

Open β†—

Inspection & Quality Hub
Inspection methods and control plans: UV checks, thickness verification, AQL/coupons/SPC, and standards-aligned acceptance.

Open β†—

Removal & Rework Hub
Removal and rework methods (wet stripping, micro-abrasion, local vs full removal) plus structured rework workflow.

Open β†—

Standards Hub
Key conformal coating and Parylene standards and how they map to inspection, workmanship and qualification expectations.

Open β†—

Parylene Basics Hub
Parylene fundamentals: grades, deposition, masking, thickness measurement and specification basics.

Open β†—

Parylene Design Hub
Design-for-Parylene: layout/spacing, vapour access, masking design, materials/adhesion, and DfM for scale-up.

Open β†—

Parylene Application Hub
Application-led guidance across medical, PCB protection, aerospace/defence, automotive/EV, sensors/MEMS and harsh environments.

Open β†—

Parylene Dimers Hub
Dimer chemistry, grades (N/C/D/AF-4), purity impacts, and selecting the right dimer for performance and reliability.

Open β†—

Why Choose SCH Services?

You gain a complete, integrated platform for Conformal Coating, Parylene & ProShieldESDβ€”plus equipment, materials and trainingβ€”backed by decades of hands-on process support.

  • πŸ› οΈ End-to-End Support – Selection, masking, inspection and troubleshooting.
  • βœ… Process Discipline – Recipes, control windows and repeatability.
  • 🌍 Global Reach – Support across Europe, North America and Asia.

πŸ“ž Call: +44 (0)1226 249019 | βœ‰ Email: sales@schservices.com | πŸ’¬ Contact Us β€Ί

Note: This article provides general technical guidance only. Final design, validation, and compliance decisions must be verified by the product manufacturer and validated against the applicable standards.